From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Resubmit: Intel 965 Express AGP patches
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:02:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060906160210.GK15918@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <115747785570-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net>
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:37:32AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The following should be the updated patch series for the Intel 965 Express
> support, unless I'm making some mistake with git-send-email. I think I've
> covered Dave's concerns
This chunk seems unrelated to 965 support.
@@ -1469,7 +1570,7 @@ static struct agp_bridge_driver intel_91
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.aperture_sizes = intel_i830_sizes,
.size_type = FIXED_APER_SIZE,
- .num_aperture_sizes = 3,
+ .num_aperture_sizes = 4,
.needs_scratch_page = TRUE,
.configure = intel_i915_configure,
.fetch_size = intel_i915_fetch_size,
It seems to be a valid fix (as there are indeed 4 entries in
intel_i830_sizes), but I wonder if this was intentional ?
Has this been tested on 915/945?
I've chopped this bit out and committed the rest, we can
add this as a separate commit, which may ease future bisecting
if anything should go awry.
The intel_830_driver struct also lists the num of sizes as '3' btw.
It could just be lots of cut-n-paste braindamage, but things like
this make me nervous in a driver that supports so much hardware
and is so.. twisted.
Also, do we need an entry in agp_intel_resume() for the 965 ?
>, except for making the PCI ID stuff table-driven.
> You can find a patch for that on the intel-agp-i965 branch at
> git://anongit.freedesktop.org/~anholt/linux-2.6
I'll take a look at those soon.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-06 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-05 17:37 Resubmit: Intel 965 Express AGP patches Eric Anholt
2006-09-05 17:37 ` [PATCH] Add support for Intel i965G/Q GARTs Eric Anholt
2006-09-05 17:37 ` [PATCH] Whitespace cleanup, remove an unnecessary comment, and remove an unnecessary include Eric Anholt
2006-09-05 17:37 ` [PATCH] Remove attribution section, which is unnecessary with revision control Eric Anholt
2006-09-06 16:02 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-09-06 16:56 ` Resubmit: Intel 965 Express AGP patches Eric Anholt
2006-09-06 17:22 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-06 17:55 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060906160210.GK15918@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox