public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
To: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [2.6.17.8] noapic and /proc/acpi/event
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:05:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200609071505.49820.len.brown@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45006A6F.8030801@domdv.de>

On Thursday 07 September 2006 14:52, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> I do have a problem with a new laptop (Acer Ferrari 4006):
> 
> It does suspend either to disk or to ram only when I do boot with
> "noapic". So far, so good.

Well no, that isn't so good either.  You shouldn't need "noapic"
for anything, either normal operation or suspend/resume.

Do ACPI events work properly w/o noapic if you don't suspend/resume?

You should be able to kill acpid, and cat /proc/acpi/event
and open/close your lid and watch events appear --
same for power button.
You should also be able to see the acpi line in /proc/interrupts
increment for each of these events.

> If, however, I do boot with "noapic" no events are delivered to
> /proc/acpi/event so lid switch and power button can't be used to suspend
> anymore.

Does noapic work properly before the suspend?
(test the same way as w/o noapic above)

> The strange thing is, that at least in /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID/state I
> can view the lid switch state.

The problem with your system is that it isn't getting ACPI interrupts.
The lid state in /proc is immune to that problem because when
you read that file Linux asks the hardware for its state on demand.

cheers,
-Len
 

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-07 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-07 18:52 [2.6.17.8] noapic and /proc/acpi/event Andreas Steinmetz
2006-09-07 19:05 ` Len Brown [this message]
2006-09-07 19:15   ` Andreas Steinmetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200609071505.49820.len.brown@intel.com \
    --to=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ast@domdv.de \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox