From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>,
akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org,
jeff@garzik.org, cw@f00f.org, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, harmon@ksu.edu,
len.brown@intel.com, vsu@altlinux.ru, liste@jordet.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 17:21:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060910002112.GA20672@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157848272.6877.108.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:31:12AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> VIA have always told me that "ACPI handles this" and we don't need
> quirks. Various chips have different IRQ routing logic and it's all a
> bit weird if we don't use ACPI and/or BIOS routing.
So why isn't acpi handling all of this for us? Do people not want to
use acpi for some reason?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-10 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-07 22:33 [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change Daniel Drake
2006-09-09 14:20 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-09 14:44 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-09 16:03 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-09 21:34 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-10 0:31 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-10 0:21 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-09-10 0:39 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-09-10 4:37 ` Greg KH
2006-09-10 9:48 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-10 15:48 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-10 18:40 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-10 20:45 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-09-10 21:30 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-10 21:34 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-09-19 20:04 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-19 20:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-09-19 20:28 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-10 16:01 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-10 16:39 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-10 16:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-10 19:06 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-10 19:41 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-10 19:21 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-11 15:33 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-11 20:16 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-11 21:23 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-11 21:38 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-12 12:37 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-12 21:38 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-13 0:48 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-11 21:54 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-12 6:21 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-11 21:44 ` Daniel Drake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060910002112.GA20672@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=harmon@ksu.edu \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liste@jordet.net \
--cc=sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox