From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Jim Gettys <jg@laptop.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
ACPI ML <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
devel@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:21:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060912092143.GD19482@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157555949.6011.516.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed 2006-09-06 11:19:09, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 12:37 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > 2.4 and 2.6 are *very* different here. You'll probably need to optimize freezer
> > > > in 2.6 a bit...
> > > >
> > >
> > > Among other problems: e.g. 2.4 did not automatically do a VT switch; 2.6
> > > does; we'll have to have a way to signal "we're a sane display driver;
> > > don't switch away from me on suspend".
> >
> > Not like that, please.
> >
> > You are using X running over framebuffer, right? So that kernel is
> > controlling the graphics hardware. In such case it is safe to avoid VT
> > switch.
>
> It should be perfectly safe.
Okay, but per-driver flag is wrong way to go (see the other mail).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-12 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-30 18:40 [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-08-30 19:43 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-08-31 23:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-09-01 0:30 ` [OLPC-devel] " Jim Gettys
2006-09-01 3:53 ` Len Brown
2006-09-01 4:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-09-01 15:51 ` Jordan Crouse
2006-09-01 13:14 ` [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] " Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2006-09-01 21:52 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-01 22:57 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-04 13:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-04 13:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05 14:31 ` Jim Gettys
2006-09-06 10:37 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-06 14:58 ` Jordan Crouse
2006-09-12 9:21 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 18:14 ` Jim Gettys
2006-09-12 18:27 ` Mitch Bradley
2006-09-12 20:18 ` Jordan Crouse
2006-09-14 9:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 9:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 11:29 ` Jim Gettys
2006-09-06 15:19 ` [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] " Jim Gettys
2006-09-12 9:21 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060912092143.GD19482@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=abelay@novell.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=devel@laptop.org \
--cc=jg@laptop.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox