From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750925AbWINQAt (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:00:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750932AbWINQAt (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:00:49 -0400 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([62.242.22.158]:55368 "EHLO kernel.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750922AbWINQAs (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:00:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:59:00 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , Tom Zanussi , ltt-dev@shafik.org, Michel Dagenais Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] LTTng-core 0.5.108 : relayfs Message-ID: <20060914155900.GB5253@kernel.dk> References: <20060914034940.GK2194@Krystal> <20060914075353.GE7425@kernel.dk> <20060914155427.GE29906@Krystal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060914155427.GE29906@Krystal> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 14 2006, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Jens Axboe (axboe@kernel.dk) wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 13 2006, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > 10 - Forward port of RelayFS 2.6.16 API, plus some enhancements. > > > patch-2.6.17-lttng-core-0.5.108-relayfs.diff > > > > One big question - why?! > > > (repeated) > It's a temporary solution only used because relayfs has been such a > moving target lately that I decided to wait for things to settle down > before switching. I plan to switch to the new relay.o and use DebugFS > for filesystem. I just haven't done the change yet. Since going into the kernel, it's only changed once and that was 6 (something like that) months ago. So I'd say that your statement there is hugely exaggerated. Just get it fixed up, if you are serious in any way with posting your patches. -- Jens Axboe