public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Mortensen <tmmlkml@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.x libata resync
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 08:38:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060916063808.GK541@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <450B9940.5030609@gmail.com>

On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 03:27:12PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:14:07PM -0700, Tom Mortensen wrote:
> >>To Jeff Garzik & others,
> >>I was wondering if there are any plans for another resync of the latest
> >>2.6.x libata changes back into the 2.4.x kernel?
> >
> >When Jeff posted his last version (which got merged), he said that it
> >would be his last work on this backport. I've been regularly checking
> >what has changed in 2.6, because often some bugs are fixed, but I see
> >that the code has considerably evolved since the last resync, and I'm
> >not even sure that those bugfixes are needed for 2.4.
> >
> >A full resync of latest 2.6 would require a considerable effort it seems.
> >Do you encounter any problems right now ? I get very few feedback from
> >SATA users in general.
> 
> I don't think it's gonna happen.  Later libata changes depend on a 
> number of SCSI updates, which in turn are deeply dependent upon new 
> driver model used in 2.6.  So, apart from bug fixes, there won't be 2.4 
> resync.

There are a bunch of small patches in the early 2.6 version which look
like bugfixes, but with non-descriptive comments, so I'm not sure what
they fix. Several of them would apply to 2.4, but I don't want to touch
this area as long as nobody complains about problems.

Regards,
Willy


  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-16  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-16  5:14 2.4.x libata resync Tom Mortensen
2006-09-16  5:37 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-16  6:27   ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-16  6:38     ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2006-09-16 15:49       ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-16 15:51         ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-16 16:07           ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-16 16:05             ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-16 16:27               ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-16 16:22                 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-16  6:47   ` Tom Mortensen
2006-09-16  6:18 ` Jeff Garzik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-20 14:52 Mikael Pettersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060916063808.GK541@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tmmlkml@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox