From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964831AbWIPQiN (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:38:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964830AbWIPQiN (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:38:13 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:48402 "EHLO 1wt.eu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964832AbWIPQiM (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:38:12 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:22:57 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Tejun Heo , Tom Mortensen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.x libata resync Message-ID: <20060916162257.GC18409@1wt.eu> References: <20060916053713.GJ541@1wt.eu> <450B9940.5030609@gmail.com> <20060916063808.GK541@1wt.eu> <450C1CF2.4080308@garzik.org> <20060916155141.GA18409@1wt.eu> <450C2134.7040200@garzik.org> <20060916160520.GB18409@1wt.eu> <450C25F5.1020307@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <450C25F5.1020307@garzik.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 12:27:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Willy Tarreau wrote: > >Of course for those. I was thinking about those which just change one > >register or things like this that I cannot identify the expected effect. > >If you agree, I'll enumerate the ones I've already noticed so that you > >just have to say yes/no/unknown on them. Don't worry, I don't want to > >spend lots of hours on this, since as I said, I do not receive any > >feedback from SATA users on 2.4 (neither positive nor negative). > > > I'm more than happy to review any 2.4 libata patches people post. OK, I will check what I found in 2.6 when I have time. Thanks, Willy