Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers

Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-09-20T18:09:18Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 505 bytes --]

Hi -

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:21:52PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:

> [...] IOW, we should be able to do what Martin suggests fairly
> easily (if we agree on a 5-byte "null" jump at the entry of
> functions of interest). Right? [...]

My interpretation of Martin's Monday proposal is that, if implemented,
we wouldn't need any of this nop/int3 stuff. If function being
instrumented were recompiled on-the-fly, then it could sport plain &
direct C-level calls to the instrumentation handlers.

- FChE

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]