public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Douglas Niehaus <niehaus@eecs.ku.edu>,
	Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com>,
	William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
	Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca>,
	systemtap@sources.redhat.com, ltt-dev@shafik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.2 for Linux 2.6.17
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:37:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060920163729.GA14961@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060920155358.GH18646@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3618 bytes --]

* Frank Ch. Eigler (fche@redhat.com) wrote:
> While varargs simplify some things, it sacrifices type-safety, in that
> a handler function would have to be varargs too.  For the systemtap
> marker prototype, parametrized variants use scores of (automatically
> generated) macros, with different arity/type permutations, each
> self-describing and type-safe.
> 
The format string could be used to provide some kind of type safety : the
compiler will check that arguments match the format string provided. From there,
a simple script can parse the format string and generate a function prototype
accordingly. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think that if the called function
has the exact same parameter layout as the varargs caller stack, the function
call should work (without the called function having a variable arguments list).

> Regarding a marker variant that would require kprobes (inserting a
> labelled NOP or few), it may be an appropriate choice where dormant
> marker overhead must be minimal and robust parameter passing is less
> important.
> 

I even came with the following idea :

Instead of using a test + conditional predicted branch, we could jump to an
address locate just after the probe.

  jmp to over_symbol address
call_symbol
  call function pointer
over_symbol

This way, we could have portable :
- direct inconditional jump to an address following the marked site when
  disabled
- Enable stack setup and function call by setting the function pointer and
  changing the jmp target to be "call_symbol"
- Enable "direct jump to arbitrary assembly" by setting the jump target to
  arbitrary code, where this code can end by jumping to over_symbol.

The generated binary on x86 looks like :

  10:   a1 24 00 00 00          mov    0x24,%eax
  15:   ff e0                   jmp    *%eax
  17:   c7 44 24 04 01 00 00    movl   $0x1,0x4(%esp)
  1e:   00 
  1f:   c7 04 24 00 00 00 00    movl   $0x0,(%esp)
  26:   ff 15 1c 00 00 00       call   *0x1c

With those symbols :

f8875c08 b __mark_subsys_mark1_call     [test_mark]  (function pointer)
f8875620 d __mark_subsys_mark1_jump_call        [test_mark]
f8875624 d __mark_subsys_mark1_jump_over        [test_mark]

The macro doing that :

#define MARK_CALL(name, format, args...) \
        do {\
                __label__ call_label, over_label; \
                static void *__mark_##name##_jump_over \
                        asm ("__mark_"#name"_jump_over") = \
                        &&over_label; \
                static void *__mark_##name##_jump_call \
                                asm ("__mark_"#name"_jump_call") \
                                __attribute__((unused)) =  \
                                &&call_label; \
                static void (*__mark_##name##_call)(const char *fmt, ...) \
                        asm ("__mark_"#name"_call") = __mark_empty_function; \
                goto *__mark_##name##_jump_over; \
call_label: \
                (void) (__mark_##name##_call(format, ## args)); \
over_label: \
                do {} while(0); \
        } while(0)

A problem I saw in your approach was that there was no way to remove the
function pointer without taking the risk to break everything.

The solution I came up with is to set the function to an empty
__mark_empty_function when disabled, and set another function pointer to enable
it.

Any thoughts ?

Mathieu


OpenPGP public key:              http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint:     8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-20 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-19 18:34 [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.2 for Linux 2.6.17 Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-19  8:39 ` S. P. Prasanna
2006-09-19 20:05   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-19 18:51 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-09-19 19:13   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-19 19:23 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-09-19 19:36   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-19 19:45     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-09-19 20:28       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-19 21:07         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-09-19 22:11           ` Karim Yaghmour
2006-09-20 13:20             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-09-20 13:38               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-20 14:57                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-20 15:53                   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-09-20 16:37                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2006-09-20 17:14                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-20 13:46               ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060920163729.GA14961@Krystal \
    --to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=karim@opersys.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltt-dev@shafik.org \
    --cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=niehaus@eecs.ku.edu \
    --cc=richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    --cc=zanussi@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox