From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750764AbWIUAJM (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:09:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750800AbWIUAJM (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:09:12 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:37323 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750764AbWIUAJK (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:09:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:09:01 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: "Paul Menage" Cc: npiggin@suse.de, sekharan@us.ibm.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rohitseth@google.com, clameter@sgi.com Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction Message-Id: <20060920170901.38696df1.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <6599ad830609201657h1756d28eh4a04f85467f30ed2@mail.google.com> References: <1158718568.29000.44.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <1158777240.6536.89.camel@linuxchandra> <6599ad830609201143h19f6883wb388666e27913308@mail.google.com> <1158778496.6536.95.camel@linuxchandra> <6599ad830609201225k3d38afe2gea7adc2fa8067e0@mail.google.com> <20060920134903.fbd9fea8.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830609201351k6d72067fpc86069ffb5bb60ba@mail.google.com> <20060920140401.39cc88ab.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830609201605s2fc1ccbdse31e3e60a50d56bc@mail.google.com> <20060920165408.c10e8857.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830609201657h1756d28eh4a04f85467f30ed2@mail.google.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul M wrote: > Indeed - although one of the advantages of the patch I sent is that it > can continue to present exactly the same interface, and functionality, > to userspace as the current cpusets code does. I'll go for that. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401