From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750834AbWIUAdb (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:33:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750838AbWIUAdb (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:33:31 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:8346 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750834AbWIUAdb (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:33:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:33:17 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: sekharan@us.ibm.com Cc: menage@google.com, npiggin@suse.de, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rohitseth@google.com, devel@openvz.org, clameter@sgi.com Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction Message-Id: <20060920173317.2277bcce.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <1158798607.6536.112.camel@linuxchandra> References: <1158718568.29000.44.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <1158777240.6536.89.camel@linuxchandra> <6599ad830609201143h19f6883wb388666e27913308@mail.google.com> <1158778496.6536.95.camel@linuxchandra> <6599ad830609201225k3d38afe2gea7adc2fa8067e0@mail.google.com> <1158780923.6536.110.camel@linuxchandra> <6599ad830609201257m22605deei25ae6a0eadb6c516@mail.google.com> <1158798607.6536.112.camel@linuxchandra> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chandra wrote: > What I am wondering is that whether the tight coupling of rg and cpuset > (into a container data structure) is ok. Just guessing wildly here, but I'd anticipate that at best we (resource groups and cpusets) would share container mechanisms, but not share the same container instances. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401