From: Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] make mdelay, udelay and ssleep calls smaller
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:03:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200609221003.53235.vda.linux@googlemail.com> (raw)
Hello Andrew,
This version is basically unchanged except for rediff
against 2.6.18. I was running previous version for
several weeks on 2.6.17.x kernels.
Russell King was giving me some feedback. I think that
my reply satisfied him - I got no further comments:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 10:39, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>On Wednesday 23 August 2006 10:14, Russell King wrote:
>> Please keep a "const" version in ARM. Thanks.
>
> Why do you want to keep it?
> I mean, without it udelay(n) will become slower by the time
> needed for one extra multiply. So we will have maybe
> udelay(n) ==> udelay(n+0.1).
>
>> Since the multiply is pure overhead, it's better
>> to get rid of it.
>
>You do not need to optimize delay for speed. If you
>really want to, then you can do:
>
>#define udelay(n) do {} while(0)
>
>Makes sense? No it does not. That's what I'm trying to say.
>You WANT to pause for thousands of cycles. Why you are trying
>to shave off ~10 cycles at the very same time?
>
>Hope it makes things clearer.
On with patch explanation:
Currently, magic in include/linux/delay.h
inlines mdelay and ssleep, and various arches
do the same to udelay.
This is pointless. We are going to perform a delay of 1000+
CPU cycles anyway, no need to optimize away a few cycles.
This patchset converts magic calls to these inlines/macros
into pure and simple function calls, with no additional
math done or hidden arguments pushed to stack
at the callsite.
Reduces allyesconfig kernel by about 7 kb.
Signed-off-by: Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
--
vda
next reply other threads:[~2006-09-22 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-22 8:03 Denis Vlasenko [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-22 15:08 [PATCH 0/3] make mdelay, udelay and ssleep calls smaller Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200609221003.53235.vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--to=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox