From: Voluspa <lista1@comhem.se>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com, pavel@suse.cz,
akpm@osdl.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hires timer patchset [was Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans]
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:36:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060924043629.5bebc404@loke.fish.not> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060923202027.GA8350@elte.hu>
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:20:27 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Voluspa wrote:
>
> > WARNING: "monotonic_clock" [drivers/char/hangcheck-timer.ko]
> > undefined!
>
> turn off the CONFIG_HANGCHECK_TIMER option.
>
> > WARNING: "hrtimer_stop_sched_tick" [drivers/acpi/processor.ko]
> > undefined! WARNING:
> > "hrtimer_restart_sched_tick" [drivers/acpi/processor.ko] undefined!
>
> add these two lins to the end of kernel/hrtimer.c:
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hrtimer_stop_sched_tick);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hrtimer_restart_sched_tick);
My mind was clouded close to bedtime. I now remember the fix that
was published already at 2.6.17 time, from Steven Rostedt:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115124086410874&w=2
Well, result is that NO_HZ indeed is the culprit for this CPU
issue. /proc/interrupts showed the timer to be stuck on an initial 3044
triggers after boot, while NMI: counted up almost as fast as LOC: (if
that tells any tale). Observing "top -d 1" for awhile revealed SYS
bursting (almost regularly alternating) between 50% and 100% CPU each 2
to 3 seconds. In between it was 0. USER also had the same pattern, but
with much longer duration. Perhaps 10 seconds from one show to the next.
I've gotten the broken out hrt-dyntick1 patches so will be able to
experiment on my own - slowly, on spare time.
I am of course available for any thoughts or trials you can come up
with in the meantime.
Mvh
Mats Johannesson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-24 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-23 2:17 hires timer patchset [was Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans] Voluspa
2006-09-23 18:09 ` Daniel Walker
2006-09-23 19:22 ` Voluspa
2006-09-23 19:58 ` Voluspa
2006-09-23 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-09-24 2:36 ` Voluspa [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-23 15:25 Voluspa
2006-09-23 16:34 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-25 11:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-09-20 20:54 2.6.19 -mm merge plans Andrew Morton
2006-09-21 13:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-09-22 13:06 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-22 19:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-09-22 20:29 ` hires timer patchset [was Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans] Bill Rugolsky Jr.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060924043629.5bebc404@loke.fish.not \
--to=lista1@comhem.se \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox