From: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:46:47 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060924114647.a0e4a650.vsu@altlinux.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060923235315.GB24214@1wt.eu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1317 bytes --]
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:53:15 +0200 Willy Tarreau wrote:
> The problem is when some hardware suddenly become detected and assigned
> in the middle of a stable release. Do not forget that people need stable
> releases to be able to blindly update and get their security vulnerabilities
> fixed. Sometimes, unlocking 2 SATA ports on the mobo by adding a PCI ID or
> adding the PCI ID of some new ethernet cards that were not supported may
> lead to such fun things (eth0 becoming eth2, sda becoming sdc, etc...).
> This causes real trouble to admins, particularly those doing remote
> updates. At least, I think that if you manage to inform people clearly
> enough, and to separate security fixes and such fixes in distinct releases,
> it might work in most situations. But this is a dangerous game anyway.
Seems that the V4L/DVB patches in question are safe in this regard.
These patches add PCI table entries matching the specific subsystem ids;
without these entries the device will still match the default entry for
the chip, and the user will get the same /dev/videoN, but most likely it
won't work correctly.
The only problem which might arise is with additional IR input devices,
but no one should expect any stable ordering there - with USB the order
of input devices is already random.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-24 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-22 22:23 Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1 Adrian Bunk
2006-09-22 22:38 ` Greg KH
2006-09-22 22:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-22 23:09 ` Greg KH
2006-09-23 4:56 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-23 23:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 23:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-24 7:46 ` Sergey Vlasov [this message]
2006-09-24 18:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 19:46 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-24 19:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-24 20:02 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-25 1:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 10:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-25 1:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-25 8:15 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-27 5:14 ` Greg KH
2006-09-23 20:49 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-23 20:57 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-23 21:20 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-23 22:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 22:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 22:47 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-23 22:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 22:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 10:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-25 1:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 20:25 ` Grant Coady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060924114647.a0e4a650.vsu@altlinux.ru \
--to=vsu@altlinux.ru \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox