From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
prasanna@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>,
Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com>,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>,
ltt-dev@shafik.org, systemtap@sources.redhat.com,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.8 for 2.6.17 (with near jump for i386)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:39:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060925053940.GA7014@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <451591AC.9030703@opersys.com>
* Karim Yaghmour (karim@opersys.com) wrote:
> diffing against an LTT tree ...
>
Ok, I will do the diff against a vanilla kernel, good point.
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/asm-alpha/marker.h
> ...
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/asm-arm/marker.h
> ...
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/asm-arm26/marker.h
> ...
> ...
>
> Not sure about the need for asm-foo/marker.h if the file contains no
> code at all. If there's going to be one marker.h per arch, it might
> as well have a purpose. So instead of:
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/asm-i386/marker.h
> ...
> > +#define ARCH_HAS_MARK_NEAR_JUMP
>
> and
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/marker.h
> ...
> > +#ifndef ARCH_HAS_MARK_NEAR_JUMP
> ...
>
> Why not just have asm-foo/marker.h either implement the optimization
> or point to an asm-generic/marker.h which contains the non-optimized
> code. No #ifndefs needed.
>
Ok, good idea.
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.marker
> ...
> > +config MARK_SYMBOL
> ...
> > +config MARK_JUMP_CALL
> ...
> > +config MARK_JUMP
> ...
>
> My understanding of Ingo's input is that he'd rather not have this
> multiple options. Either the markers are active or they aren't.
> So ...
> MARK_ACTIVE ... speaks for itself, enables both the markers and
> the set/disable infrastructure. Markers are enabled in their
> optimized per-architecture implementation.
>
> MARK_FORCE_DIRECT_CALL ... forces all markers to be non-optimized
> (good for embedded systems where the image is in rom/flash and
> can therefore not have runtime binary modifications.) Maybe this
> should depend on CONFIG_EMBEDDED.
>
>
Ok, now only :
CONFIG_MARKERS
and
CONFIG_MARKERS_FORCE_DIRECT_CALL (only appears is EMBEDDED is enabled)
I have rewritted almost everything else, I will post a patch soon (currently
cleaning up). It now supports inline function, unrolled loops and multiple
definitions of the same marker.
Supporting inline functions has proven more important than I first thought
because of gcc 4.0+ optimisations where it takes a static-only function and
inline it automatically in the body of the caller. It removes the symbols of the
inlined function when it does that.
My new approach is a separate .markers section, everything is there.
Mathieu
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-25 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-22 21:42 [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.8 for 2.6.17 (with near jump for i386) Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-23 19:57 ` Karim Yaghmour
2006-09-25 5:39 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060925053940.GA7014@Krystal \
--to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=karim@opersys.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@shafik.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
--cc=zanussi@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox