public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	prasanna@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>,
	Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com>,
	Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>,
	ltt-dev@shafik.org, systemtap@sources.redhat.com,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	"Jose R. Santos" <jrs@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:28:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060925232828.GA29343@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060925160115.GE25296@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2202 bytes --]

Hi,

* Frank Ch. Eigler (fche@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi -
> 
> > [...]
> > - It _does not_ change the compiler optimisations.
> 
> Like any similar mechanism, it does force the compiler to change its
> code generation, so one can't claim this too strongly.
> 
Yes, memory dependencies are changed, you are right. I was principally talking
about the inline and unrolled loops optimisations.


> > [...]  Comments are welcome,
> 
> I'm still uneasy about the use of varargs.  The current code now uses
> the formatting string as metadata to be matched (strcmp) between
> producer and consumer.  A general tool that would use them would have
> to start parsing general printf directives.

If you want to generate probes automatically, yes.

> I believe they are not
> quite general enough either e.g. to describe a raw binary blob.
> 
If you want to dump a raw binary blob, what about :
MARK(mysubsys_myevent, "char %p %u", blobptr, blobsize);
where %p is a pointer to an array of char and %u the length ?

My idea is to use the string to identify what is referred by a pointer, so it
can be casted into this type with some kind of coherency between the marker and
the probe.

> I realize they serve a useful purpose in abbreviating what otherwise
> one might have to do (like that multiplicity of STAP_MARK_* type/arity
> permutations).  But maybe there is a better way.
> 

I think that duplicating the number of marker macros could easily make
them unflexible and ugly. This is why I am trying to come with this generic
macro.

> Also, while regparm(0) may provide some comfort on x86, is there good
> reason to believe that the same trick works (and will continue to
> work) on non-x86 platforms to invoke a non-varargs callee with a
> varargs caller?
> 

Good point, I will setup a va_args in the probe. When correctly used, however,
there is no need to use the format string : we can directly get the variables
from the var arg list if we know in advance what the string will be.

Mathieu

OpenPGP public key:              http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint:     8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-25 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-25 15:10 [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17 Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-25 16:01 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-09-25 23:28   ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2006-09-26 16:39     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-09-27  1:30       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-27 16:12         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-09-25 18:16 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-25 20:10   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-25 20:25     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-25 20:35       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-25 20:47         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-25 21:22           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-25 21:32             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-25 21:35               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-09-25 23:13   ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060925232828.GA29343@Krystal \
    --to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=jrs@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=karim@opersys.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltt-dev@shafik.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    --cc=michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    --cc=zanussi@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox