From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: When will the lunacy end? (Was Re: [PATCH] uswsusp: add pmops->{prepare,enter,finish} support (aka "platform mode"))
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:31:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060926223146.GI4547@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1159306711.7485.13.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 07:38:31AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 22:35 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 26 September 2006 22:14, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 12:45:00AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > >...
> > > > solid)
> > > > apart from HIGHMEM64G fiasco, and related agpgart fiasco long
> > > > time before that... these are driver problems...
> > > >...
> > >
> > > One point that seems to be a bit forgotten is that driver problems do
> > > actually matter a lot:
> > >
> > > I for one do not care much whether I can abort suspending (I can always
> > > resume) or whether dancing penguins are displayed during suspending -
> > > but the fact that my saa7134 card only outputs the picture but no sound
> > > after resuming from suspend-to-disk is a real show-stopper for me.
>
> Agreed that some things are more important than others. But to some
> people, user interface does matter. After all, we want (well I want)
> people considering converting from Windows to see that free software can
> be better than proprietary stuff, not just imitate what they're doing.
>
> Suspend2 doesn't actually provide dancing penguins while suspending -
> it's a simple progress bar in either pure text or overlayed on an image
> of your choosing.
>
> The support for aborting is really just fall out from the work on
> debugging and testing failure paths.
>...
Sorry if this sounded as if I was against improvements of suspend.
That was not my intention.
But as long as there are driver problems, suspend as a whole can not be
called solid. The core itself might be solid or not, but without working
drivers this doesn't buy users much.
A user might be impressed by a progress bar on a nifty image, but if one
or more of his drivers have problems with suspend the user won't get a
good impression of Linux.
How many driver problems with suspend are buried in emails and
Bugzillas (will problems like kernel Bugzilla #6035 ever be debugged?)?
> Nigel
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-26 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-25 7:13 [PATCH] uswsusp: add pmops->{prepare,enter,finish} support (aka "platform mode") Stefan Seyfried
2006-09-25 8:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-25 8:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-25 19:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-25 21:34 ` When will the lunacy end? (Was Re: [PATCH] uswsusp: add pmops->{prepare,enter,finish} support (aka "platform mode")) Nigel Cunningham
2006-09-25 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-25 22:45 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-25 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-25 23:21 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-26 0:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-26 10:08 ` Stefan Seyfried
2006-09-26 10:24 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-26 16:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-27 9:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-27 21:08 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-27 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-27 21:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-27 22:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-27 23:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-26 19:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-26 16:45 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-09-26 17:44 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-26 17:29 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-09-27 9:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-26 19:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-26 20:14 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-26 20:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-26 21:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-09-26 22:31 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-09-26 22:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-26 23:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-09-26 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-26 23:39 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-27 0:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-27 5:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-27 5:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-09-27 6:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-27 7:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-27 8:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-27 9:02 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-27 23:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-28 10:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-26 23:43 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-09-25 22:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-26 10:12 ` Stefan Seyfried
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060926223146.GI4547@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=seife@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox