From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965261AbWI0FDY (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:03:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965263AbWI0FDY (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:03:24 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:44938 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965261AbWI0FDW (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:03:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:56:11 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Ed Swierk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au Subject: Re: [RETRY] [PATCH] load_module: no BUG if module_subsys uninitialized Message-ID: <20060927045611.GC32644@kroah.com> References: <20060922201637.GA17547@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:28:57PM -0700, Ed Swierk wrote: > On 9/22/06, Greg KH wrote: > >How are you calling load_module before this init call is made? > > In my case, net-pf-1 is getting modprobed as a result of hotplug > trying to create a UNIX socket. Calls to hotplug begin after the > topology_init initcall. So, with this patch the module will still not be loaded properly, right? Well, I guess at least we don't oops... ok. thanks, greg k-h