From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965474AbWI0K05 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:26:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965524AbWI0K05 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:26:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:49813 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965474AbWI0K05 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:26:57 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Andre Noll Subject: Re: 2.6.18-mm1 compile failure on x86_64 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:26:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Andy Whitcroft , Martin Bligh , Andrew Morton , LKML , Ian Campbell References: <45185A93.7020105@google.com> <20060927095839.GK20462@skl-net.de> In-Reply-To: <20060927095839.GK20462@skl-net.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609271226.44834.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 27 September 2006 11:58, Andre Noll wrote: > On 19:35, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > I have seen this one as well, > > Me too. Current linus git tree, x86_64 SMP, gcc-3.3.5, GNU ld version 2.15, binutils > 2.15-6, Debian. We can probably revert the notes patch for now, since it is only needed for Xen which isn't even merged yet. Ian, do you think you can do the notes in some different way that still works with old binutils? -Andi