From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750733AbWI1LH3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:07:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751835AbWI1LH2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:07:28 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:35278 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750733AbWI1LH2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:07:28 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver for mcs7830 (aka DeLOCK) USB ethernet adapter Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:07:21 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, David Hollis , support@moschip.com, dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Helmling References: <200609170102.50856.arnd@arndb.de> <200609271828.58205.david-b@pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <200609271828.58205.david-b@pacbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609281307.22923.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:c48f057754fc1b1a557605ab9fa6da41 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 28 September 2006 03:28, David Brownell wrote: > ... yes, I'd assume it's a hardware issue too.  Try different > cables; if you have a fast 'scope, you might see what kind of > eye diagram you get. Unfortunately, I don't have anything I could use to test this. > Do you know how the remote wakeup mechanism works for this chip? > It'd be interesting to see "usbnet" be taught how to autosuspend > chips which will wake up the USB host when they get the right > kind of packet ... for example, passing the multicast/broadcast > filter, or addressed directly to that adapter. > > Such an autosuspend mechanism would let the host controller stop > polling a mostly-idle network link, getting rid of one source of > periodic DMA transfers and thus allowing deeper sleep states for > many x86 family CPUs.  And also, I'd expect, giving fewer > opportunities for those broken RX packets.  :) No, don't know. I did not find anything about this in the public spec. Arnd <><