public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	LSE-Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Chandra S Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
	John T Kohl <jtk@us.ibm.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 06/10] Task watchers v2 Register NUMA mempolicy task watcher
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:02:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060929021301.134993000@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060929020232.756637000@us.ibm.com

[-- Attachment #1: task-watchers-register-numa-mempolicy --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3776 bytes --]

Register a NUMA mempolicy task watcher instead of hooking into
copy_process() and do_exit() directly.

Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/exit.c  |    4 ----
 kernel/fork.c  |   15 +--------------
 mm/mempolicy.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/mm/mempolicy.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -87,10 +87,11 @@
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
 #include <linux/migrate.h>
 #include <linux/rmap.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
+#include <linux/task_watchers.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
 /* Internal flags */
@@ -1331,10 +1332,33 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_copy(struct mem
 		}
 	}
 	return new;
 }
 
+static int init_task_mempolicy(unsigned long clone_flags,
+			       struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ 	tsk->mempolicy = mpol_copy(tsk->mempolicy);
+ 	if (IS_ERR(tsk->mempolicy)) {
+		int retval;
+
+ 		retval = PTR_ERR(tsk->mempolicy);
+ 		tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
+		return retval;
+ 	}
+	mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(tsk);
+	return 0;
+}
+task_watcher_func(init, init_task_mempolicy);
+
+static int free_task_mempolicy(unsigned int ignored, struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	mpol_free(tsk);
+	tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
+}
+task_watcher_func(free, free_task_mempolicy);
+
 /* Slow path of a mempolicy comparison */
 int __mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, struct mempolicy *b)
 {
 	if (!a || !b)
 		return 0;
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/kernel/fork.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1058,19 +1058,10 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 		p->tgid = current->tgid;
 
 	retval = notify_task_watchers(WATCH_TASK_INIT, clone_flags, p);
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
- 	p->mempolicy = mpol_copy(p->mempolicy);
- 	if (IS_ERR(p->mempolicy)) {
- 		retval = PTR_ERR(p->mempolicy);
- 		p->mempolicy = NULL;
- 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt;
- 	}
-	mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(p);
-#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	p->irq_events = 0;
 #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
 	p->hardirqs_enabled = 1;
 #else
@@ -1099,11 +1090,11 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
 	p->blocked_on = NULL; /* not blocked yet */
 #endif
 
 	if ((retval = security_task_alloc(p)))
-		goto bad_fork_cleanup_policy;
+		goto bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt;
 	/* copy all the process information */
 	if ((retval = copy_files(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
 	if ((retval = copy_fs(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_files;
@@ -1275,14 +1266,10 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_fs:
 	exit_fs(p); /* blocking */
 bad_fork_cleanup_files:
 	exit_files(p); /* blocking */
 bad_fork_cleanup_security:
 	security_task_free(p);
-bad_fork_cleanup_policy:
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	mpol_free(p->mempolicy);
-#endif
 bad_fork_cleanup_delays_binfmt:
 	delayacct_tsk_free(p);
 	notify_task_watchers(WATCH_TASK_FREE, 0, p);
 	if (p->binfmt)
 		module_put(p->binfmt->module);
Index: linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-mm1.orig/kernel/exit.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-mm1/kernel/exit.c
@@ -930,14 +930,10 @@ fastcall NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long co
 
 	tsk->exit_code = code;
 	proc_exit_connector(tsk);
 	exit_notify(tsk);
 	exit_task_namespaces(tsk);
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	mpol_free(tsk->mempolicy);
-	tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
-#endif
 	/*
 	 * This must happen late, after the PID is not
 	 * hashed anymore:
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&tsk->pi_state_list)))

--

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-29  2:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-29  2:02 [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/10] Task watchers v2 Task watchers v2 Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:32   ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Jackson
2006-09-29 19:38     ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-29 20:13       ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-30  0:01         ` Matt Helsley
2006-09-30  0:04           ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/10] Task watchers v2 Register audit task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/10] Task watchers v2 Register semundo " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/10] Task watchers v2 Register cpuset " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:31   ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  7:52     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  8:03       ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  2:02 ` Matt Helsley [this message]
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/10] Task watchers v2 Register IRQ flag tracing " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/10] Task watchers v2 Register lockdep " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/10] Task watchers v2 Register process keyrings " Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/10] Task watchers v2 Register process events connector Matt Helsley
2006-09-29  2:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction Paul Jackson
2006-09-29  8:16   ` [RFC][PATCH] Task watchers and modules (WAS Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction) Matt Helsley
2006-09-29 16:22   ` [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction Paul Menage

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060929021301.134993000@us.ibm.com \
    --to=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=jtk@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox