From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750782AbWI3KkM (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:40:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750803AbWI3KkM (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:40:12 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.183]:49659 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750782AbWI3KkK (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:40:10 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet ethernet patches Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:40:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Linas Vepstas , jeff@garzik.org, akpm@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, James K Lewis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060929230552.GG6433@austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20060929230552.GG6433@austin.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609301240.03464.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:bf0b512fe2ff06b96d9695102898be39 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Saturday 30 September 2006 01:05 schrieb Linas Vepstas: > Although these patches have not been baking in > any -mm tree, they have been tested and are > generally available as a part of the Cell SDK 2.0 > overseen by Arnd Bergmann. (Arnd, if you want > to lend a voice of authority here, or to correct > me, please do so...) > > The following sequence of six patches implement a > series of changes to the transmit side of the > spidernet ethernet device driver, significantly > improving performance for large packets. > > This series of patches is almost identical to > those previously mailed on 18-20 August, with one > critical change: NAPI polling is used instead of > homegrown polling. > > Although these patches improve things, I am not > satisfied with how this driver behaves, and so > plan to do additional work next week. > I'm not sure if I have missed a patch in here, but I don't see anything reintroducing the 'netif_stop_queue' that is missing from the transmit path. Do you have a extra patch for that? Arnd <><