From: Bryce Harrington <bryce@osdl.org>
To: "Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OOPS] -git8,9: NULL pointer dereference in mptspi_dv_renegotiate_work
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:55:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060930215544.GB7957@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <664A4EBB07F29743873A87CF62C26D702A994F@NAMAIL4.ad.lsil.com>
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:22:50PM -0600, Moore, Eric wrote:
> On Fri 9/29/2006 6:27 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>
> > Does this look better?
> >
> > http://crucible.osdl.org/runs/2265/sysinfo/amd01.3.console
>
>
> It appears that the problem is we're not receiving interrupts.
> The first command after interrupts enabled is not getting a response
> back from firmware, thus timing out. I noticed in the log its
> saying interrupt is at 185, but apparently the INT line is not getting
> raised.
>
> In addition, I understand why the panic. You've compiled the drivers
> into the kernel, instead of module. i.e. if you compiled as module,
> mptspi wouldn't been called while mptbase is loaded, as in your case.
> I guess we would need to add sanity check for that case. I'm usually
> testing as modules.
Ah, that could explain it; when doing testing we do compile everything
in. So it sounds like we could eliminate the panic by compiling as a
module, however is it intended that the driver should work when compiled
in as well? If so, I'd be happy to do additional testing to verify any
fixes worth trying out.
> Besides, we need to undertand why your interrupt controller is not
> generating interrupts.
We typically boot every -mm, -git, -rc and mainline kernel on this
machine, but it's only been relatively recently that this particular
behavior has occurred. Could this suggest that there was a regression
due to recent changes?
Thanks,
Bryce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-30 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-30 0:10 [OOPS] -git8,9: NULL pointer dereference in mptspi_dv_renegotiate_work Moore, Eric
2006-09-30 0:27 ` Bryce Harrington
[not found] ` <664A4EBB07F29743873A87CF62C26D702A994F@NAMAIL4.ad.lsil.com>
2006-09-30 21:55 ` Bryce Harrington [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-29 18:29 Moore, Eric
2006-09-29 21:41 ` Bryce Harrington
2006-09-28 20:25 Bryce Harrington
2006-09-28 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-28 22:54 ` Bryce Harrington
2006-09-29 0:26 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-29 17:17 ` Bryce Harrington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060930215544.GB7957@osdl.org \
--to=bryce@osdl.org \
--cc=Eric.Moore@lsil.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox