From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751546AbWJACRo (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:17:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751547AbWJACRo (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:17:44 -0400 Received: from gateway.insightbb.com ([74.128.0.19]:12397 "EHLO asav01.insightbb.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751534AbWJACRo (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:17:44 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AbgeAEHBHkWBTogSgg8s From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: appletouch vs. usbhid Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:17:39 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton References: <20060930142003.8ba909b1.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20060930142003.8ba909b1.zaitcev@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609302217.40895.dtor@insightbb.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Pete, On Saturday 30 September 2006 17:20, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Dear Dmitry: > > A user filed a bug here which seems to indicate that hid lacks needed > exclusions for Apple pointers: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208721 > Do you think we should be adding QUIRK_IGNORE for these? Yes, I think we should. > Perhaps conditional on CONFIG_USB_APPLETOUCH? No, I think we should just do that unconditionally and have users select appletouch driver. > > We used to have those IGNORE quirks for Wacom, but then started to ignore > all Wacoms. We seem to be not at that point with Apple yet, and also they > have varying vendor IDs. > Ping Cheng swore that Wacom never produced HID-compiant device and that it would be easier for her if we blacklisted Wacom as vendor in HID... -- Dmitry