From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
prasanna@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>,
Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com>,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>,
ltt-dev@shafik.org, systemtap@sources.redhat.com,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
"Jose R. Santos" <jrs@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Performance analysis of Linux Kernel Markers 0.20 for 2.6.17
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:33:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061001153317.GB24313@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1159676382.2355.13.camel@entropy>
* Nicholas Miell (nmiell@comcast.net) wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 23:42 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Nicholas Miell (nmiell@comcast.net) wrote:
> > >
> > > Has anyone done any performance measurements with the "regular function
> > > call replaced by a NOP" type of marker?
> > >
> >
> > Here it is (on the same setup as the other tests : Pentium 4, 3 GHz) :
> >
> > * Execute an empty loop
> >
> > - Without marker
> > NR_LOOPS : 10000000
> > time delta (cycles): 15026497
> > cycles per loop : 1.50
> >
> > - With 5 NOPs
> > NR_LOOPS : 100000
> > time delta (cycles): 300157
> > cycles per loop : 3.00
> > added cycles per loop for nops : 3.00-1.50 = 1.50
> >
> >
> > * Execute a loop of memcpy 4096 bytes
> >
> > - Without marker
> > NR_LOOPS : 10000
> > time delta (cycles): 12981555
> > cycles per loop : 1298.16
> >
> > - With 5 NOPs
> > NR_LOOPS : 10000
> > time delta (cycles): 12983925
> > cycles per loop : 1298.39
> > added cycles per loop for nops : 0.23
> >
> >
> > If we compare this approach to the jump-over-call markers (in cycles per loop) :
> >
> > NOPs Jump over call generic Jump over call optimized
> > empty loop 1.50 1.17 2.50
> > memcpy 0.23 2.12 0.07
> >
> >
> >
> > Mathieu
>
> What about with two NOPs (".byte 0x66, 0x66, 0x90, 0x66, 0x90" - this
> should work with everything) or one (".byte 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00,
> 0x00" - AFAIK, this should work with P6 or newer).
>
> (Sorry, I should have mentioned this the first time.)
>
Hi,
The tests I made were with :
#define GENERIC_NOP1 ".byte 0x90\n"
#define GENERIC_NOP4 ".byte 0x8d,0x74,0x26,0x00\n"
#define GENERIC_NOP5 GENERIC_NOP1 GENERIC_NOP4
Now with the tests you ask for :
* Execute an empty loop
- 2 NOPs ".byte 0x66, 0x66, 0x90, 0x66, 0x90"
NR_LOOPS : 100000
time delta (cycles): 200190
cycles per loop : 2.00
cycles per loop for nops : 2.00-1.50 = 0.50
- 1 NOP "0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00"
NR_LOOPS : 100000
time delta (cycles): 300172
cycles per loop : 3.00
cycles per loop for nops : 3.00-1.50 = 2.50
* Execute a loop of memcpy 4096 bytes
- 2 NOPs ".byte 0x66, 0x66, 0x90, 0x66, 0x90"
NR_LOOPS : 10000
time delta (cycles): 12981293
cycles per loop : 1298.13
cycles per loop for nops : 1298.16-1298.13=0.03
- 1 NOP "0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00"
NR_LOOPS : 10000
time delta (cycles): 12985590
cycles per loop : 1298.56
cycles per loop for nops : 0.43
Mathieu
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-01 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-30 18:01 Performance analysis of Linux Kernel Markers 0.20 for 2.6.17 Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-09-30 19:02 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-10-01 3:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-10-01 4:19 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-10-01 15:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2006-10-01 23:57 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-10-02 0:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-10-02 0:53 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-10-02 14:31 ` [UPDATE] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-10-02 15:24 ` Jose R. Santos
2006-10-02 15:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-10-08 19:31 ` dean gaudet
2006-10-08 19:40 ` dean gaudet
2006-10-10 13:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061001153317.GB24313@Krystal \
--to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=jrs@us.ibm.com \
--cc=karim@opersys.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@shafik.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nmiell@comcast.net \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
--cc=zanussi@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox