Re: Announce: gcc bogus warning repository

Daniel Walker
2006-10-01T19:25:53Z

On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:20 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:13:54PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:07 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:03:10PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > > > And that's better than the current situation in which respects, exactly?
> > > >
> > > > Seeing the warnings is the current situation.
> > >
> > > I bow to your incredible power of observation. Now that you've shared
> > > that revelation with the list, could you explain what does blanket silencing
> > > of these warnings buy you, oh wan^H^Hise one?
> >
> > Did you see me silencing anything (with your crystal ball?) ? Cause I'm
> > not.
>
> And what, in your opinion, does the patch in question achieve if not
> that?

You mean the patch from Steven posted in May? Well it does appear to
silence the warning. You didn't like the approach it seems? Please tell
me why .

Daniel