Re: Announce: gcc bogus warning repository

Al Viro
2006-10-01T19:20:36Z

On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:13:54PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:07 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:03:10PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > > And that's better than the current situation in which respects, exactly?
> > >
> > > Seeing the warnings is the current situation.
> >
> > I bow to your incredible power of observation. Now that you've shared
> > that revelation with the list, could you explain what does blanket silencing
> > of these warnings buy you, oh wan^H^Hise one?
>
> Did you see me silencing anything (with your crystal ball?) ? Cause I'm
> not.

And what, in your opinion, does the patch in question achieve if not
that?

PS: sorry, I leave crystal balls to RMS et.al. - never had been
into that kind of scam...