From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030613AbWJCWUg (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:20:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030619AbWJCWUf (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:20:35 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:39399 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030613AbWJCWUR (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:20:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:20:04 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Zach Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH take2 0/5] dio: clean up completion phase of direct_io_worker() Message-Id: <20061003152004.ca255c33.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20061002232119.18827.96966.sendpatchset@tetsuo.zabbo.net> References: <20061002232119.18827.96966.sendpatchset@tetsuo.zabbo.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:21:19 -0700 (PDT) Zach Brown wrote: > I've tested these on low end PC drives with aio-stress, the direct IO tests I > could manage to get running in LTP, orasim, and some home-brew functional > tests. I trust a lot of testing was done on blocksize