From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
esandeen@redhat.com, Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 ext3 panic.
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:45:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061003164537.GC23492@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061003064030.GA23492@redhat.com>
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:40:30AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > ----------- [cut here ] --------- [please bite here ] ---------
> > > > Kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2791
> > >
> > > I had thought/hoped that this was fixed by Jan's patch at
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/7/236 from the thread started at
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/1/149, but it seems maybe not. Dave hit this bug
> > > first by going through that new codepath....
> >
> > Yes, Jan's patch is supposed to fix that !buffer_mapped() assertion. iirc,
> > Badari was hitting that BUG and was able to confirm that Jan's patch
> > (3998b9301d3d55be8373add22b6bc5e11c1d9b71 in post-2.6.18 mainline) fixed
> > it.
>
> Ok, this afternoon I was definitly running a kernel with that patch in it,
> and managed to get a trace (It was the one from the top of this thread
> that unfortunatly got truncated).
>
> Now, I can't reproduce it on a plain 2.6.18+that patch.
> I'll leave the stress test running overnight, and see if anything
> falls out in the morning.
Been chugging away for 10 hrs now without repeating that incident. Hmm.
That patch looks like good -stable material. I'll keep digging to
see if I can somehow reproduce the problem I saw with the patch applied,
but in absense of something better, I think we should go with it.
One thing that did happen in the 10hrs was fsx-over-NFS spewed some
nasty looking trace. I'll post that separately next.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-03 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-02 19:47 2.6.18 ext3 panic Dave Jones
2006-10-03 5:22 ` Dave Jones
2006-10-03 5:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-03 6:19 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-03 6:40 ` Dave Jones
2006-10-03 16:45 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-10-09 19:46 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-09 19:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-09 21:59 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-09 22:50 ` Dave Jones
2006-10-10 14:11 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-10 18:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-10 22:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-10 22:25 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-11 1:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-11 10:33 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-11 13:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-11 14:22 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-11 17:54 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-12 2:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-12 4:34 ` John Wendel
2006-10-12 6:57 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2006-10-12 12:28 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-12 13:20 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-12 16:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-12 16:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-12 20:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-12 21:55 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-12 21:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-12 22:34 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-13 7:56 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-13 16:08 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-16 16:54 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-16 16:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-09 22:40 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2006-10-10 13:16 ` Jan Kara
2006-10-10 16:39 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061003164537.GC23492@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox