From: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@free.fr>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@infradead.org,
matthew@wil.cx, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, akpm@osdl.org,
rdunlap@xenotime.net, gregkh@suse.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] add pci_{request,free}_irq take #2
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:29:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061003222910.GJ2785@slug> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4522E0E0.9020404@garzik.org>
> >Index: 2.6.18-mm3/include/linux/interrupt.h
> >===================================================================
> >--- 2.6.18-mm3.orig/include/linux/interrupt.h
> >+++ 2.6.18-mm3/include/linux/interrupt.h
> >@@ -75,6 +75,13 @@ struct irqaction {
> > struct proc_dir_entry *dir;
> > };
> > +#ifndef ARCH_VALIDATE_PCI_IRQ
> >+static inline int is_irq_valid(unsigned int irq)
> >+{
> >+ return irq ? 1 : 0;
> >+}
> >+#endif /* ARCH_VALIDATE_PCI_IRQ */
>
> It's not appropriate to have PCI IRQ stuff in linux/interrupt.h.
>
> This is precisely why I passed 'struct pci_dev *' to a PCI-specific irq validation function, and prototyped it in linux/pci.h.
>
My bad, I've mixed your proposal and Matthew's, isn't this just a
matter of:
s/ARCH_VALIDATE_PCI_IRQ/ARCH_VALIDATE_IRQ/ ?
I'll look if there's some non-PCI code that might check the irq's value
and thus might benefit from this.
Regards,
Frederik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-03 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-03 22:07 [RFC PATCH] add pci_{request,free}_irq take #2 Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 22:14 ` [RFC PATCH] move aic7xxx to pci_request_irq Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 22:14 ` [RFC PATCH] add pci_{request,free}_irq take #2 Jeff Garzik
2006-10-03 22:29 ` Frederik Deweerdt [this message]
2006-10-03 22:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-04 2:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-03 22:19 ` [RFC PATCH] move aic79xx to pci_request_irq Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 22:22 ` [RFC PATCH] move tg3 " Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 22:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-03 22:41 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-04 5:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-04 6:27 ` David Miller
2006-10-04 9:09 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 22:23 ` [RFC PATCH] move e1000 " Frederik Deweerdt
2006-10-03 22:36 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061003222910.GJ2785@slug \
--to=deweerdt@free.fr \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox