* netconsole not working on 2.6.17.6
@ 2006-09-16 14:51 Benjamin Schindler
[not found] ` <452291C3.8090503@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Schindler @ 2006-09-16 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 828 bytes --]
Hi
I'm unsuccesfully trying to get networking to work - I've got two boxes that
can ping each other: 192.168.0.101 and 192.168.0.102 - I load the netconsole
module:
modprobe netconsole
netconsole=6666@192.168.0.102/eth0,6666@192.168.0.101/00:02:44:34:5d:f6
In dmesg I get:
netconsole: local port 6666
netconsole: local IP 192.168.0.102
netconsole: interface eth0
netconsole: remote port 6666
netconsole: remote IP 192.168.0.101
netconsole: remote ethernet address 00:02:44:34:5d:f6
netconsole: network logging started
I start wireshark/tcpdump whatever - and load a few modules just to produce
some kernel messages. However, noething leaves the wire but I get all the
messages in dmesg.
What's wrong here?
Thanks
Benjamin Schindler
P.s. please cc me as I'm not subscribed to this list
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <452291C3.8090503@gmail.com>]
* Re: netconsole not working on 2.6.17.6 [not found] ` <452291C3.8090503@gmail.com> @ 2006-10-04 11:26 ` Benjamin Schindler 2006-10-04 16:05 ` Matt Mackall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Schindler @ 2006-10-04 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Menegotto, linux-kernel; +Cc: mpm On Tuesday 03 October 2006 18:37, you wrote: > Benjamin Schindler wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm unsuccesfully trying to get networking to work - I've got two boxes that > > can ping each other: 192.168.0.101 and 192.168.0.102 - I load the netconsole > > module: > > > > modprobe netconsole > > netconsole=6666@192.168.0.102/eth0,6666@192.168.0.101/00:02:44:34:5d:f6 > > > > In dmesg I get: > > > > netconsole: local port 6666 > > netconsole: local IP 192.168.0.102 > > netconsole: interface eth0 > > netconsole: remote port 6666 > > netconsole: remote IP 192.168.0.101 > > netconsole: remote ethernet address 00:02:44:34:5d:f6 > > netconsole: network logging started > > > > I start wireshark/tcpdump whatever - and load a few modules just to produce > > some kernel messages. However, noething leaves the wire but I get all the > > messages in dmesg. > > > > What's wrong here? > > > > Thanks > > Benjamin Schindler > > > > P.s. please cc me as I'm not subscribed to this list > > > Are you pointing to the correct MAC? Have you tried to compile the > netconsole as built-in? > Yes, I'm pointing at the correct MAC, but since wireshark doesn't see in the networl, I doubt anything actually is sent. No, I have not tried to compile netconsole into the kernel because of flexibility. Anyway, I have investiaged further: I ran this systemtap script: probe module("netconsole").function("write_msg@drivers/net/netconsole.c") { printf("WriteMsg called\b") } Once this script was run, I rmmod and modprobe'd my wireless-module a few times to generate some dmesg output, but according to systemtap, this function never gets called. So, either the call to register_console in netconsole fails, is wrong or there is a but in register_console Thanks Benjamin Schindler ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: netconsole not working on 2.6.17.6 2006-10-04 11:26 ` Benjamin Schindler @ 2006-10-04 16:05 ` Matt Mackall 2006-10-04 17:10 ` Benjamin Schindler 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Matt Mackall @ 2006-10-04 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Schindler; +Cc: Alan Menegotto, linux-kernel On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:26:54PM +0200, Benjamin Schindler wrote: > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 18:37, you wrote: > > Benjamin Schindler wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I'm unsuccesfully trying to get networking to work - I've got two boxes > that > > > can ping each other: 192.168.0.101 and 192.168.0.102 - I load the > netconsole > > > module: > > > > > > modprobe netconsole > > > netconsole=6666@192.168.0.102/eth0,6666@192.168.0.101/00:02:44:34:5d:f6 > > > > > > In dmesg I get: > > > > > > netconsole: local port 6666 > > > netconsole: local IP 192.168.0.102 > > > netconsole: interface eth0 > > > netconsole: remote port 6666 > > > netconsole: remote IP 192.168.0.101 > > > netconsole: remote ethernet address 00:02:44:34:5d:f6 > > > netconsole: network logging started > > > > > > I start wireshark/tcpdump whatever - and load a few modules just to > produce > > > some kernel messages. However, noething leaves the wire but I get all the > > > messages in dmesg. > > > > > > What's wrong here? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Benjamin Schindler > > > > > > P.s. please cc me as I'm not subscribed to this list > > > > > Are you pointing to the correct MAC? Have you tried to compile the > > netconsole as built-in? > > > Yes, I'm pointing at the correct MAC, but since wireshark doesn't see in the > networl, I doubt anything actually is sent. > No, I have not tried to compile netconsole into the kernel because of > flexibility. Anyway, I have investiaged further: > I ran this systemtap script: > > probe module("netconsole").function("write_msg@drivers/net/netconsole.c") { > printf("WriteMsg called\b") > } > > Once this script was run, I rmmod and modprobe'd my wireless-module a few > times to generate some dmesg output, but according to systemtap, this > function never gets called. > So, either the call to register_console in netconsole fails, is wrong or there > is a but in register_console The usual problem is that the console log level is set too low. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: netconsole not working on 2.6.17.6 2006-10-04 16:05 ` Matt Mackall @ 2006-10-04 17:10 ` Benjamin Schindler 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Schindler @ 2006-10-04 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matt Mackall; +Cc: Alan Menegotto, linux-kernel On Wednesday 04 October 2006 18:05, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:26:54PM +0200, Benjamin Schindler wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 18:37, you wrote: > > > Benjamin Schindler wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I'm unsuccesfully trying to get networking to work - I've got two > > > > boxes > > > > that > > > > > > can ping each other: 192.168.0.101 and 192.168.0.102 - I load the > > > > netconsole > > > > > > module: > > > > > > > > modprobe netconsole > > > > netconsole=6666@192.168.0.102/eth0,6666@192.168.0.101/00:02:44:34:5d: > > > >f6 > > > > > > > > In dmesg I get: > > > > > > > > netconsole: local port 6666 > > > > netconsole: local IP 192.168.0.102 > > > > netconsole: interface eth0 > > > > netconsole: remote port 6666 > > > > netconsole: remote IP 192.168.0.101 > > > > netconsole: remote ethernet address 00:02:44:34:5d:f6 > > > > netconsole: network logging started > > > > > > > > I start wireshark/tcpdump whatever - and load a few modules just to > > > > produce > > > > > > some kernel messages. However, noething leaves the wire but I get all > > > > the messages in dmesg. > > > > > > > > What's wrong here? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Benjamin Schindler > > > > > > > > P.s. please cc me as I'm not subscribed to this list > > > > > > Are you pointing to the correct MAC? Have you tried to compile the > > > netconsole as built-in? > > > > Yes, I'm pointing at the correct MAC, but since wireshark doesn't see in > > the networl, I doubt anything actually is sent. > > No, I have not tried to compile netconsole into the kernel because of > > flexibility. Anyway, I have investiaged further: > > I ran this systemtap script: > > > > probe module("netconsole").function("write_msg@drivers/net/netconsole.c") > > { printf("WriteMsg called\b") > > } > > > > Once this script was run, I rmmod and modprobe'd my wireless-module a few > > times to generate some dmesg output, but according to systemtap, this > > function never gets called. > > So, either the call to register_console in netconsole fails, is wrong or > > there is a but in register_console > > The usual problem is that the console log level is set too low. I did 'echo 9 4 1 7 > /proc/sys/kernel/printk' and nothing changed. I also tried to set the log level to 9 using sysrq (dmesg confirmed), but I still don't get any messages Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-04 17:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-16 14:51 netconsole not working on 2.6.17.6 Benjamin Schindler
[not found] ` <452291C3.8090503@gmail.com>
2006-10-04 11:26 ` Benjamin Schindler
2006-10-04 16:05 ` Matt Mackall
2006-10-04 17:10 ` Benjamin Schindler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox