From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@austin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/base: error handling fixes
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:16:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061005131623.GC6920@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45250161.4060002@garzik.org>
> >>If someone wants to provide a better fix, let's see the patch...
> >If sysfs_remove_group() would also work for non-created (-existent) groups
> >then the patch below would work. Unfortunately that is not the case. So one
> >would have to remember if sysfs_create_group() was done and succeeded before
> >calling sysfs_remove_group()...
> >There must be an easier way.
> >diff --git a/drivers/base/topology.c b/drivers/base/topology.c
> >index 3ef9d51..d0056c3 100644
> >--- a/drivers/base/topology.c
> >+++ b/drivers/base/topology.c
>
> ACK
Ah, you probably got me wrong. The patch doesn't work, because of the
sysfs_remove_group() stuff. That's why there is no Signed-off-by:...
What _could_ happen with this patch applied: some code fails on
CPU_UP_PREPARE and then all notifiers get called with CPU_UP_CANCELLED.
That would cause the call of topology_remove_dev(sys_dev) and therefore
sysfs_remove_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &topology_attr_group) which will crash,
because sysfs_create_group() wasn't even called.
To fix this one has to remember if sysfs_create_group() succeeded or was
even called. That would be a per-cpu array. Now, I think it's just
overkill to introduce a per-cpu array for error-checking.
IMHO it would make sense to change sysfs_remove_group() so it will survive
if being asked to remove groups that don't exist.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-05 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-04 13:05 [PATCH] drivers/base: error handling fixes Jeff Garzik
2006-10-04 14:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-04 15:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-05 8:17 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-10-05 11:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-05 12:48 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-10-05 12:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-05 13:16 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2006-10-09 7:29 ` [patch 1/2] sysfs: allow removal of nonexistent sysfs groups Heiko Carstens
2006-10-09 7:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-09 7:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-10-09 7:30 ` [patch 2/2] cpu topology: various fixes/cleanups Heiko Carstens
2006-10-05 13:15 ` [PATCH] drivers/base: error handling fixes Cornelia Huck
2006-10-05 13:20 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-10-05 13:45 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061005131623.GC6920@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathanl@austin.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox