From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751213AbWJEURq (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:17:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751214AbWJEURq (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:17:46 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:40082 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751213AbWJEURq (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:17:46 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Steve Bergman Subject: Re: Free memory level in 2.6.16? Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:17:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <1160034527.23009.7.camel@localhost> <1160079029.29452.19.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1160079029.29452.19.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610052217.38345.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Thank you for the reply, Andi. This kernel is compiled with the .config > from the original FC5 release, which used kernel 2.6.15. I just ran > "make oldconfig" on it and accepted the defaults. I meant in the source. There are no tunables for this in .config > So it is, I believe, a 4GB/4GB split. Does that make a difference? The kernel.org kernel doesn't support 4/4 split. -Andi