From: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@codemonkey.org.uk
Subject: Re: [2.6.19-rc1][AGP] Regression - amd_k7_agp no longer detected
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 02:59:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610060259.52742.shawn.starr@rogers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061006060803.GB3381@redhat.com>
On Friday 06 October 2006 2:08 am, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:50:19AM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > When loading amd_k7_agp nothing appears from kernel, no information
> > about the AGP chipset/aptreture size etc. Even putting kprints inside
> > the probe() function of the driver does not get called.
>
> Even as the first thing in agp_amdk7_probe() ?
Nada, nothing appears even if I put a printk before we do any actual probing.
> What is pci_register_driver returning ?
Don't know yet. II didn't yet walk agp_amdk7_init() and dump out the values
yet.
> When we modprobe the chipset driver, and run through the ->probe, it's all
> pci layer stuff really, up until we agp_alloc_bridge(). But if you're not
> getting that far, the core agpgart stuff doesn't even come into play.
> It's something of a mystery to me as that driver hasn't changed in ages
> asides from spelling fixes and other trivialities.
It does appear to be PCI. Yes, I don't see any significant changes in the agp
code (other than the one mentioned below)
> Damn, that's going back a bit..
> But again, this driver hasn't really changed much since 2.5.x, so I'm
> wondering if this is a side-effect of some change in another subsystem.
> Can you narrow it down to a specific kernel version where it broke ?
> 2.6.15 -> 2.6.18 is such a huge delta it's not even worth looking at.
> Narrow the scope, and I'll eyeball the pci changes etc.
> I don't have any AMD hardware to test any more, so I've no chance of
> trying to reproduce this. All I can suggest is to try and narrow
> down where it's failing, and then maybe I'll have enough clues to hazard
> a guess at the cause.
I'm going to do some git bisect fun (best time to learn how to do it) and
narrow this down later when I get back from work. We should find the cuprate
later today.
> > Looking at the differences, I noticed some changes in generic.c for
> > determing the AGP speed. I don't know if this has anything to do with
> > this breaking. This video card is a Radeon 7500 AiW 64MB DDR and can do
> > AGP4x and BIOS has AGP4x turned on by default. But this all would fail
> > even before X is started if agpgart finds no chipset.
>
> That code runs later when /dev/agpgart is open()'d, so it shouldn't
> affect this. It shouldn't be hard to revert though if you want to
> try it. Also, that only changed the AGPx8 path, which no K7 chipsets can
> do. If you ended up running that code, something is deeply screwed.
> Dave
I can certainly do a quick debug on that to confirm if it is or not hitting
that code path later today.
Thanks Dave. I'll provide you more info once I narrow things down a bit.
Shawn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-06 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-06 5:50 [2.6.19-rc1][AGP] Regression - amd_k7_agp no longer detected Shawn Starr
2006-10-06 6:08 ` Dave Jones
2006-10-06 6:59 ` Shawn Starr [this message]
2006-12-11 2:06 ` Kevin Puetz
2006-12-12 18:06 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610060259.52742.shawn.starr@rogers.com \
--to=shawn.starr@rogers.com \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox