From: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 11:42:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610071142.26045.prakash@punnoor.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45276085.3040102@shaw.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 618 bytes --]
Am Samstag 07 Oktober 2006 10:08 schrieb Robert Hancock:
> I've been working on the patch for sata_nv ADMA support for nForce4 that
Nice!
> make the default 1). I only enabled ADMA on those chipsets and not
> MCP51, MCP55 or MCP61 since that was all that the original NVIDIA
> version did. I assume there was a reason for this, though maybe not.
Unfortunately it doesn't work for me on MCP51 if I change GENERIC to ADMA. So
I wonder whether MCP51 has ADMA mode or what needs to be done to get NCQ
working. :-(
Cheers,
--
(°= =°)
//\ Prakash Punnoor /\\
V_/ \_V
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-07 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-07 8:08 [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive Robert Hancock
2006-10-07 9:42 ` Prakash Punnoor [this message]
2006-10-07 15:54 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-10 6:44 ` Allen Martin
2006-10-10 7:52 ` Prakash Punnoor
2006-11-30 16:46 ` Prakash Punnoor
2006-12-01 0:07 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-07 15:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-07 23:49 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-10 6:52 ` Allen Martin
2006-10-11 5:07 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-11 10:30 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-13 3:17 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-13 8:04 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-17 3:34 ` [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4 Robert Hancock
2006-10-17 3:37 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-17 4:24 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-17 16:22 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-17 17:58 ` Roland Dreier
2006-10-17 20:54 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-16 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive Mark Lord
2006-10-16 23:40 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-17 0:04 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610071142.26045.prakash@punnoor.de \
--to=prakash@punnoor.de \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox