From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: simoneau@ele.uri.edu
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [sparc64] 2.6.18 unaligned accesses in eth1394
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:36:07 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061009.183607.63736982.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061005211543.GA18539@ele.uri.edu>
From: Will Simoneau <simoneau@ele.uri.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:15:44 -0400
> The first one I seem to be able to fix by adding a get_unaligned() at
> lines 1679-1680 of eth1394.c around eth->h_dest; the second one seems to
> be triggered by this code:
Right.
> (gdb) list *ether1394_data_handler+0x914
> 0xc94 is in ether1394_data_handler (drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c:1264).
> 1259 priv->stats.rx_dropped++;
> 1260 dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> 1261 goto bad_proto;
> 1262 }
> 1263
> 1264 if (netif_rx(skb) == NET_RX_DROP) {
> 1265 priv->stats.rx_errors++;
> 1266 priv->stats.rx_dropped++;
> 1267 goto bad_proto;
> 1268 }
Actually, I think this one is in eth1394_parse_encap().
Can you test this patch and tell me if it makes both unaligned
access problems go away? Thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c b/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c
index 8a7b8fa..78abb9b 100644
--- a/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c
+++ b/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ #include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/ethtool.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/delay.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
#include <net/arp.h>
#include "config_roms.h"
@@ -894,6 +895,7 @@ static inline u16 ether1394_parse_encap(
u16 maxpayload;
struct eth1394_node_ref *node;
struct eth1394_node_info *node_info;
+ __be64 guid;
/* Sanity check. MacOSX seems to be sending us 131 in this
* field (atleast on my Panther G5). Not sure why. */
@@ -902,8 +904,9 @@ static inline u16 ether1394_parse_encap(
maxpayload = min(eth1394_speedto_maxpayload[sspd], (u16)(1 << (max_rec + 1)));
+ guid = get_unaligned(&arp1394->s_uniq_id);
node = eth1394_find_node_guid(&priv->ip_node_list,
- be64_to_cpu(arp1394->s_uniq_id));
+ be64_to_cpu(guid));
if (!node) {
return 0;
}
@@ -1675,8 +1678,9 @@ #endif
if (max_payload < dg_size + hdr_type_len[ETH1394_HDR_LF_UF])
priv->bc_dgl++;
} else {
+ __be64 guid = get_unaligned((u64 *)eth->h_dest);
node = eth1394_find_node_guid(&priv->ip_node_list,
- be64_to_cpu(*(u64*)eth->h_dest));
+ be64_to_cpu(guid));
if (!node) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto fail;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-10 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-05 21:15 [sparc64] 2.6.18 unaligned accesses in eth1394 Will Simoneau
2006-10-05 22:22 ` David Miller
2006-10-10 1:36 ` David Miller [this message]
2006-10-10 13:29 ` Will Simoneau
2006-10-10 22:17 ` David Miller
2006-10-11 12:33 ` Stefan Richter
2006-10-28 0:12 ` David Miller
2006-10-28 6:46 ` Stefan Richter
2006-10-12 14:37 ` Will Simoneau
2006-10-12 21:34 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061009.183607.63736982.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simoneau@ele.uri.edu \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox