From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751616AbWJIRmJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:42:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751638AbWJIRmJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:42:09 -0400 Received: from codepoet.org ([166.70.99.138]:9414 "EHLO codepoet.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751616AbWJIRmI (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:42:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:42:06 -0600 From: Erik Andersen To: David Woodhouse Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-kernel-headers-2.6.19-rc1.tar.gz Message-ID: <20061009174205.GA24502@codepoet.org> Reply-To: andersen@codepoet.org Mail-Followup-To: andersen@codepoet.org, David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1160032160.26064.17.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1160032160.26064.17.camel@pmac.infradead.org> X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 08:09:20AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > A full set of user-visible kernel headers for all supported > architectures, exported from the 2.6.19-rc1 kernel, has been uploaded > to > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/dwmw2/kernel-headers/snapshot/ > > I had planned to do this for 2.6.18 but it wasn't quite in good enough > shape by then. This one should be fine -- you can build your C library > against it and ship it in /usr/include. And tell me what breaks... I'm curious how you produced this for all architectures? Did you write up a script to so something trivial like for i in $LINUX_DIR/arch/*; do make ARCH=$(basename $i) INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/tmp/foo headers_install; done or did you do something more complicated and interesting? If so, would you mind sharing? -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--