Re: [patch 00/67] 2.6.18-stable review

Greg KH
2006-10-11T22:00:27Z

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:36:48PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.18.1 release.
> > There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> > this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
> > us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
> > to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> >
> > These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the Cc:
> > line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email stable@kernel.org to
> > add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list,
> > also email us.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Friday, October 13, 20:00:00 UTC. Anything
> > received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > And yes, we realize that this is a large number of patches, sorry, we
> > have been a bit slow in responding lately. If there are any patches
> > that have been sent to us for the 2.6.18-stable tree, that are not in
> > this series, please resend them, as we think we are finally caught up
> > with this work.
> >
> > An all-in-one patch for this series can be found at:
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/stable/patch-2.6.18.1-rc1.gz
> > if anyone wants to test this out that way.
>
> Is it intentional that this adds a include/linux/utsrelease.h ?
> I don't see any patch that adds it in the review mails, but its there in the gz.

Hm, I guess the dontdiff file wasn't updated, as I built and booted out
of that directory, so that is where it came from. Sorry about that.

Anyone want to update dontdiff? :)

thanks,

greg k-h