From: "S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar@pardus.org.tr>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: kraxel@suse.de, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Avoid PIT SMP lockups
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:31:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610112231.49942.caglar@pardus.org.tr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1160594802.5973.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 945 bytes --]
11 Eki 2006 Çar 22:26 tarihinde, john stultz şunları yazmıştı:
> On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 22:09 +0300, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> > 11 Eki 2006 Çar 21:43 tarihinde, john stultz şunları yazmıştı:
> > > S.Çağlar: Didn't follow this bit at all. Could you explain a bit more?
> >
> > Of course, while system boots kernel waits ~5 seconds (maybe more) after
> > printing "Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in
> > supervisor mode... Ok." line without any visual activity and after that
> > waiting period kernel panics.
>
> And this results in the same panic you linked to earlier?
Yes, kernel only panics if it waits there, if somehow can pass here (as i
wrote before it can boot normally for every ~1/10 reboot) no panic occurs.
Cheers
--
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@pardus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/
Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-11 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-06 21:38 [RFC] Avoid PIT SMP lockups john stultz
2006-10-07 15:50 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-10 9:11 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-10 18:27 ` john stultz
2006-10-11 10:49 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-11 17:59 ` john stultz
2006-10-11 18:37 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-11 18:43 ` john stultz
2006-10-11 19:09 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-11 19:26 ` john stultz
2006-10-11 19:31 ` S.Çağlar Onur [this message]
2006-10-12 7:28 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2006-10-12 7:45 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-16 22:17 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-10-16 22:21 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-17 12:05 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-17 12:16 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-19 8:00 ` [PATCH] Fix potential interrupts during alternative patching [was Re: [RFC] Avoid PIT SMP lockups] Zachary Amsden
2006-10-19 8:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-10-19 9:00 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-10-20 10:36 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-20 5:25 ` Greg KH
2006-10-16 22:40 ` [RFC] Avoid PIT SMP lockups Andi Kleen
2006-10-16 23:25 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-10-16 16:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2006-10-16 16:22 ` Vmware problems was " Andi Kleen
2006-10-16 22:16 ` Petr Vandrovec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610112231.49942.caglar@pardus.org.tr \
--to=caglar@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kraxel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox