From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de,
Don Mullis <dwm@meer.net>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [patch 7/7] stacktrace filtering for fault-injection capabilities
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:20:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061012142004.a111ca6a.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <452df23e.44ca1e09.1a7f.780f@mx.google.com>
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:43:12 +0900
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
>
> This patch provides stacktrace filtering feature.
> The stacktrace filter allows failing only for the caller you are
> interested in.
>
> stacktrace filter is enabled by setting the value of
> /debugfs/*/stacktrace-depth more than 0.
> and specify the range of the virtual address
> by the /debugfs/*/address-start and /debugfs/*/address-end
>
> Please see the example that demostrates how to inject slab allocation
> failures only for a specific module
> in Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt
I read the documentation but I still don't understand this feature. What
does the stacktrace actually do? It gets stored somewhere and displayed
later? What's it all for?
> --- work-fault-inject.orig/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ work-fault-inject/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -472,6 +472,8 @@ config LKDTM
>
> config FAULT_INJECTION
> bool
> + select STACKTRACE
> + select FRAME_POINTER
>
> config FAILSLAB
> bool "fault-injection capabilitiy for kmalloc"
>
Is the selection of FRAME_POINTER really needed? The fancy new unwinder
is supposed to be able to handle frame-pointerless unwinding?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-12 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20061012074305.047696736@gmail.com>
2006-10-12 7:43 ` [patch 1/7] documentation and scripts Akinobu Mita
2006-10-12 21:37 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-13 17:47 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-10-13 19:01 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-12 7:43 ` [patch 2/7] fault-injection capabilities infrastructure Akinobu Mita
2006-10-12 21:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-12 7:43 ` [patch 3/7] fault-injection capability for kmalloc Akinobu Mita
2006-10-12 8:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-10-12 7:43 ` [patch 4/7] fault-injection capability for alloc_pages() Akinobu Mita
2006-10-12 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-13 17:51 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-10-12 7:43 ` [patch 5/7] fault-injection capability for disk IO Akinobu Mita
2006-10-12 21:08 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-13 7:03 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-12 7:43 ` [patch 6/7] process filtering for fault-injection capabilities Akinobu Mita
2006-10-13 17:28 ` Don Mullis
2006-10-13 18:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-12 7:43 ` [patch 7/7] stacktrace " Akinobu Mita
2006-10-12 21:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-10-13 18:00 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-10-13 18:12 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-10-13 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-13 19:03 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061012142004.a111ca6a.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=dwm@meer.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox