public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nmeyers@vestmark.com
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Major slab mem leak with 2.6.17 / GCC 4.1.1
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:55:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061013105502.GA9773@viviport.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1160727912.15431.11.camel@Homer.simpson.net>

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:25:12AM +0000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 20:49 -0400, nmeyers@vestmark.com wrote:
> 
> > I tried Catalin Marinas' kmemleak patches, and had to rebuild with
> > GCC 3.4.6 because of a 4.1.1 compiler bug that prevents compilation
> > of the patches.
> 
> Yeah, seems any remotely recent gcc hates it.  That puts a rather large
> dent in usability.
> 
> > And... building with 3.4.5 fixed the leak! So I guess I have very little
> > detail to report - except that there's a nasty leak in 2.6.17 when built
> > with 4.1.1.
> 
> If you build using 3.4.5 _without_ the kmemleak patches, do you see the
> leak again?  (ie is kmemleak altering timing, or is kernel miscompiled)

I wondered the same thing. I went back to the original source and .config
- rebuilding with 3.4.6 (3.4.5 is a typo) fixed the leak.

> 
> > If anyone has a version of kmemleak that I can build with 4.1.1, or
> > any other suggestions for instrumentation, I'd be happy to gather more
> > data - the problem is very easy for me to reproduce.
> 
> I can only suggest trying latest/greatest to see if the issue is still
> present, and if so, try to find a way that others may trigger it.

I may just do that - apparently 4.1.2 is supposed to fix the kmemleak
compile problem. My (admittedly lazy) inclination is to wait until that
comes out in a Gentoo ebuild.

Nathan


> 
> 	-Mike
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-13 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-13  0:49 Major slab mem leak with 2.6.17 / GCC 4.1.1 nmeyers
2006-10-13  5:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-10-13 11:59   ` Catalin Marinas
2006-10-15  7:59     ` Mike Galbraith
2006-10-15 14:14       ` nmeyers
2006-10-15 17:59         ` Mike Galbraith
2006-10-18 13:59           ` Nathan Meyers
2006-10-16  5:32       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-10-16  8:07         ` Catalin Marinas
2006-10-16  9:08           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-10-16  8:44             ` Catalin Marinas
2006-10-16  9:33               ` Mike Galbraith
2006-10-13  8:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-10-13 10:55   ` nmeyers [this message]
2006-10-13 21:28     ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061013105502.GA9773@viviport.com \
    --to=nmeyers@vestmark.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox