From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932136AbWJNIvV@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932136AbWJNIvV (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 14 Oct 2006 04:51:21 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932135AbWJNIvU
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 14 Oct 2006 04:51:20 -0400
Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:22251 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932137AbWJNIvU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 14 Oct 2006 04:51:20 -0400
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 01:51:09 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
       kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: swsusp APIC oopsen (was Re: swsusp ooms)
Message-Id: <20061014015109.0ff2c52f.akpm@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061014083227.GA3868@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <20061009213359.7f2806b6.akpm@osdl.org>
	<200610132231.08643.rjw@sisk.pl>
	<20061013140000.329e8854.akpm@osdl.org>
	<200610132307.47162.rjw@sisk.pl>
	<20061014002504.1ab10ee9.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20061014004046.670ddd76.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20061014082237.GA3818@elf.ucw.cz>
	<20061014083227.GA3868@elf.ucw.cz>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:32:27 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:

> On Sat 2006-10-14 10:22:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > (cc-ed to public list)
> > 
> > > Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > and I'm not having much luck.  See 
> > > > 
> > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/s5000340.jpg and
> > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/s5000339.jpg
> > > 
> > > Running an UP kernel and disabling local APIC avoided the oopses and
> > > allowed me to confirm that it was leaking.  whoops.
> > 
> > I wonder why everyone but me sees those APIC problems?
> > 
> > Anyway, there's one more problem in -rc1: boot order changed, and (at
> > least with paralel boot options), swsusp gets initialized *after*
> > swsusp => bad, but should be easy to fix.
> 
> Sorry, I meant:
> 
> "sata is initialized *after* swsusp => bad".

Which patch made this change, and why?