From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Val Henson <val_henson@linux.intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:21:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061014052110.GB21616@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061013214135.8fbc9f04.akpm@osdl.org>
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:41:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:05:18 -0600
> Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
>
> > Since some devices may not implement the MWI bit, we should check that
> > the write did set it and return an error if it didn't.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index a544997..3d041f4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -900,13 +900,17 @@ #endif
> > return rc;
> >
> > pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
> > - if (! (cmd & PCI_COMMAND_INVALIDATE)) {
> > - pr_debug("PCI: Enabling Mem-Wr-Inval for device %s\n", pci_name(dev));
> > - cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_INVALIDATE;
> > - pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
> > - }
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > + if (cmd & PCI_COMMAND_INVALIDATE)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + pr_debug("PCI: Enabling Mem-Wr-Inval for device %s\n", pci_name(dev));
> > + cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_INVALIDATE;
> > + pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
> > +
> > + /* read result from hardware (in case bit refused to enable) */
> > + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
> > +
> > + return (cmd & PCI_COMMAND_INVALIDATE) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > /**
>
> Bisection shows that this patch
> (pci-check-that-mwi-bit-really-did-get-set.patch in Greg's PCI tree) breaks
> suspend-to-disk on my Vaio. It writes the suspend image and gets to the
> point where it's supposed to power down, but doesn't.
>
> After a manual power-cycle it successfully resumes from disk, but
> networking (at least) is dead.
Ok, I'll drop this from my tree too.
Matthew, let me know whn you have a revised patch you wish to have me
include.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-14 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-06 19:05 [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-06 19:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] [TULIP] Check the return value from pci_set_mwi() Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-06 19:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-06 19:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-06 19:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-07 5:34 ` Grant Grundler
2006-10-07 14:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-06 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set Jeff Garzik
2006-10-14 4:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-14 5:21 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-10-14 14:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-14 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-15 3:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-15 6:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-15 13:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-15 17:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-15 7:08 ` [Bulk] " David Brownell
2006-10-15 13:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-15 14:21 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-15 13:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-15 17:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-15 19:16 ` David Brownell
2006-10-15 19:34 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-15 22:45 ` David Brownell
2006-10-15 23:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-16 0:02 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-15 23:44 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-16 0:44 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-16 1:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-16 2:07 ` David Brownell
2006-10-16 10:58 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-16 11:02 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-16 0:16 ` David Brownell
2006-10-16 0:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-16 10:59 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-15 21:52 ` [Bulk] " Alan Cox
2006-10-16 0:00 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-16 0:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-16 0:21 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061014052110.GB21616@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=val_henson@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox