public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] l2cap endianness annotations
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:49:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061015234902.GY29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1160955543.14340.21.camel@localhost>

On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:39:03AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> this data structure is visible to the userspace (via the Bluetooth
> library headers). Do we annotate them, too?

Yes. linux/types.h is exported header and it defines all endian types.
 
> > @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ struct l2cap_pinfo {
> >  
> >  	__u8		ident;
> >  
> > -	__u16		sport;
> > +	__le16		sport;
> >  
> >  	struct l2cap_conn	*conn;
> >  	struct sock		*next_c;
> 
> These are internal. We should have to annotate them. They should store
> it in host order. If not, than that is the problem.

They do not.  Trivial search in vanilla tree shows
                for (psm = 0x1001; psm < 0x1100; psm += 2)
                        if (!__l2cap_get_sock_by_addr(psm, src)) {
                                l2cap_pi(sk)->psm   = htobs(psm);
                                l2cap_pi(sk)->sport = htobs(psm);
                                err = 0;
                                break;
                        }

which is very definitely not putting a host-endian there.  You can
switch it to host-endian, of course, but then you have to modify
at least that place.
 
> > @@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ static inline int l2cap_config_req(struc
> >  	if (!(sk = l2cap_get_chan_by_scid(&conn->chan_list, dcid)))
> >  		return -ENOENT;
> >  
> > -	l2cap_parse_conf_req(sk, req->data, cmd->len - sizeof(*req));
> > +	l2cap_parse_conf_req(sk, req->data, __le16_to_cpu(cmd->len) - sizeof(*req));
> 
> I have to look into this change. It basically means that this code never
> worked on big endian systems, but it actually does.

You are misreading it.  Old code flipped cmd->len in place in the caller.
New one doesn't.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-15 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-15 21:29 [PATCH 1/4] l2cap endianness annotations Al Viro
2006-10-15 23:39 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-10-15 23:49   ` Al Viro [this message]
2006-10-16  0:12   ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061015234902.GY29920@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox