From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: David Johnson <dj@david-web.co.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:25:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061016102500.GA1709@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610131724.40631.dj@david-web.co.uk>
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 05:24:39PM +0100, David Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 14:06, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > Probably - but only with networking. So I'd try with this debugging
> > like in my first reply plus maybe 2.6.19-rc1 (e1000 - btw. I hope
> > this other tested card was different model - and locking improved)
> > and resend conclusions to netdev@vger.kernel.org.
> >
>
> OK I built a 2.6.19-rc1 kernel with a minimal config as you describe and I
> cannot reproduce the reboots with this kernel. My .config:
> http://www.david-web.co.uk/download/config
I've seen more minimal minimal configs but if it works
it is 50% of success.
> The other NIC I tried was a D-Link DL10050-based card which I think uses the
> dl2k module.
>
> I tried to reproduce the problem under Windows (2k), which didn't reboot but
> did still suffer from it I believe. Randomly during an scp transfer (using
> the PuTTY scp client) Windows will lock-up for about 30 seconds, making an
> entry in the event log indicating that there was a time-out talking to the
> IDE controller, then continuing. Could the same thing be happening in Linux?
> If Linux can't talk to the IDE controller when trying to write to disk, how
> does it handle that?
Was this lock-up effect visible during above 2.6.19-rc1 tests?
If not I'd try to continue linux debbuging:
- is 2.6.19-rc1 working with "normal" config (use make oldconfig
to "upgrade" .config),
- is 2.6.17 working with "minimal" config (use make oldconfig),
- changing one or two options at a time try to find which one makes
the effect returns (acpi, smp...).
Regards,
Jarek P.
PS: Sorry for late reply - I was offline.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-16 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-12 16:53 Hardware bug or kernel bug? David Johnson
2006-10-12 17:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-12 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-13 9:20 ` David Johnson
2006-10-13 8:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-10-13 9:20 ` David Johnson
2006-10-13 10:58 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-10-13 11:56 ` David Johnson
2006-10-13 13:06 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-10-13 16:24 ` David Johnson
2006-10-13 17:11 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-16 10:25 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2006-10-16 14:32 ` David Johnson
2006-10-17 7:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061016102500.GA1709@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=dj@david-web.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox