public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
	Alok Kataria <alok.kataria@calsoftinc.com>,
	"Shai Fultheim (Shai@scalex86.org)" <shai@scalex86.org>,
	"Benzi Galili (Benzi@ScaleMP.com)" <benzi@scalemp.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] slab: Fix a cpu hotplug race condition while tuning slab cpu caches
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:26:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061016192615.GA3746@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061016111511.3901be27.akpm@osdl.org>

On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:15:11AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 01:54:39 -0700
> Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org> wrote:
> 
> The problem is obvious: we have some data (the array caches) and we have a
> data structure which is used to look up that data (cpu_online_map).  But
> we're releasing the lock while these two things are in an inconsistent
> state.
> 
> So you could have fixed this by taking cache_chain_mutex in CPU_UP_PREPARE
> and releasing it in CPU_ONLINE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.

Hmm, yes. I suppose so. Maybe we can do away with other uses of
lock_cpu_hotplug() in slab.c as well then!  Will give it a shot. Slab
locking might look uglier than what it already is though no?

> 
> >  	list_for_each_entry(cachep, &cache_chain, next) {
> > @@ -4087,6 +4088,7 @@ ssize_t slabinfo_write(struct file *file
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  	mutex_unlock(&cache_chain_mutex);
> > +	unlock_cpu_hotplug();
> >  	if (res >= 0)
> >  		res = count;
> >  	return res;
> 
> Given that this lock_cpu_hotplug() happens at a high level I guess it'll
> avoid the usual lock_cpu_hotplug() horrors and we can live with it.  I
> assume lockdep was enabled when you were testing this?

Not when I tested it.  I just retested with lockdep on and things seemed 
fine on a SMP.

Thanks,
Kiran

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-16 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-16  8:54 [patch] slab: Fix a cpu hotplug race condition while tuning slab cpu caches Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-10-16  9:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-10-16 18:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-16 19:26   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2006-10-16 19:48     ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-16 22:43       ` 2.6.19-rc2 cpu hotplug lockdep warning: possible circular locking dependency Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-10-16 22:58         ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061016192615.GA3746@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alok.kataria@calsoftinc.com \
    --cc=benzi@scalemp.com \
    --cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shai@scalex86.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox