From: "S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar@pardus.org.tr>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: "Dave Jones" <davej@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ondemand/Conservative not working with 2.6.18
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:29:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610162329.17482.caglar@pardus.org.tr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EB12A50964762B4D8111D55B764A8454BA3D91@scsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1462 bytes --]
16 Eki 2006 Pts 16:08 tarihinde, Pallipadi, Venkatesh şunları yazmıştı:
> Sorry for the delayed response. This is still very mysterious to me..
>
> Do you see anything interesting in dmesg after you try this ac adapter
> unplug and plug back routine? Can you send me the dmesg. Better still open
> a bugzilla at bugme.osdl.org and stick the dmesg and acpidump there.
No, nothing interested and i filled a bug [1] with all related info
> One possible reason for this is, somehow idle statistics is getting all
> wrong and ondemand thinks CPU is busy, even though it is idle. I have seen
> this happening earlier when there are issues with local APIC interrupts in
> deep C-states on dual core systems. But, here it is a single core CPU.
> Right? Can you also get the output of #cat /proc/interrupts; sleep 10; cat
> /proc/interrupts
> On your system when ondemand is not working and when it is working (After
> your unplug-plug workaround.
Hmm top show something weird;
Tasks: 39 total, 1 running, 38 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 32.4%us, 12.4%sy, 0.0%ni, 41.1%id, 13.0%wa, 0.4%hi, 0.6%si, 0.0%st
There were nothing runs right that time but top reports only ~%40 idle [full
log attached to bug]
[1] http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7376
--
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@pardus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/
Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-16 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-16 13:08 Ondemand/Conservative not working with 2.6.18 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-10-16 20:29 ` S.Çağlar Onur [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-11 19:00 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-10-11 19:08 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-11 19:38 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-11 19:39 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-13 18:33 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-09 23:35 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-10-10 20:54 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-04 13:33 S.Çağlar Onur
2006-10-09 21:52 ` S.Çağlar Onur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610162329.17482.caglar@pardus.org.tr \
--to=caglar@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox