public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: AIO, DIO fsx tests failures on 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:10:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061017161014.756e8a97.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453559D5.4000809@us.ibm.com>

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:31:49 -0700
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:38:19 -0700
> > Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >>> So the answer is that -rc1-mm1 doesn't quite have the most recent
> >>> version of this patch.  Grab the final patch at the end of this post
> >>> from Andrew:
> >>>
> >>> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/11/234
> >>>
> >>> It fixes up a misunderstanding that came from
> >>> generic_file_buffered_write()'s habit of adding its 'written' input into
> >>> the amount of bytes it announces having written in its return value.
> >>>
> >>> From mm-commits it looks like -mm2 will have the full patch.
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> Hmm.. with that patch applied, I still have fsx failures.
> >> This time read() returning -EINVAL. Are there any other fixes
> >> missing in -mm ?
> >>     
> >
> > Probably.  I need to get off butt and prepare rc2-mm1.
> >
> > The below is the full patch against 2.6.19-rc2.  Please test this version.
> >
> >
> > From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
> >
> > When direct-io falls back to buffered write, it will just leave the dirty data
> > floating about in pagecache, pending regular writeback.
> >
> > But normal direct-io semantics are that IO is synchronous, and that it leaves
> > no pagecache behind.
> >
> > So change the fallback-to-buffered-write code to sync the file region and to
> > then strip away the pagecache, just as a regular direct-io write would do.
> >
> >   
> 
> Okay. Finally tracked down the problem I am running into.
> This happens only on reiserfs
> 
> # /root/fsx-linux -N 10000 -o 128000 -r 2048 -w 4096 -Z -R -W
> jnk
> mapped writes DISABLED
> truncating to largest ever: 0x32740
> truncating to largest ever: 0x39212
> truncating to largest ever: 0x3bae9
> truncating to largest ever: 0x3c1e3
> truncating to largest ever: 0x3d1cd
> truncating to largest ever: 0x3e8b8
> truncating to largest ever: 0x3ed14
> truncating to largest ever: 0x3f9c2
> truncating to largest ever: 0x3ff9f
> doread: read: Invalid argument
> Segmentation fault
> 
> Here is the strace for it
> ..
> ftruncate(3, 2721)                      = 0
> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2721, ...}) = 0
> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_END)                   = 2721
> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2721, ...}) = 0
> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_END)                   = 2721
> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2721, ...}) = 0
> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_END)                   = 2721
> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_SET)                   = 0
> read(3, 0x50a800, 2048)                 = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> 
> reiserfs getblock() is returing -EINVAL. There is comment in the code
> about tail handling and returning EINVAL. BTW, this is not a -mm
> issue, it happens on mainline too...
> 

Does it fail in mainline, or only in
mainline+direct-io-sync-and-invalidate-file-region-when-falling-back-to-buffered-write.patch?


  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-17 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-16 15:42 AIO, DIO fsx tests failures on 2.6.19-rc1-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-16 17:51 ` Zach Brown
2006-10-16 17:59   ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-16 20:13     ` Zach Brown
2006-10-16 20:38       ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-16 20:59         ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-16 21:21           ` Zach Brown
2006-10-17 22:31           ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-17 23:10             ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-10-17 23:38               ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-18 15:44             ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061017161014.756e8a97.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox