From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
"Phetteplace, Thad (GE Healthcare,
consultant)" <Thad.Phetteplace@ge.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Allocations under CFQ I/O Scheduler
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:44:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061018124420.GI24452@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1161175344.9363.30.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Oct 18 2006, Alan Cox wrote:
> Bandwidth is completely silly in this context, iops/sec is merely
> hopeless 8)
Both need the disk to play nicely, if you get into error handling or
correction, you get screwed. Bandwidth by itself is meaningless, you
need latency as well to make sense of it.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-18 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-16 20:46 Bandwidth Allocations under CFQ I/O Scheduler Phetteplace, Thad (GE Healthcare, consultant)
2006-10-17 1:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-17 13:23 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-17 14:37 ` Ric Wheeler
2006-10-17 14:47 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-17 14:46 ` Phetteplace, Thad (GE Healthcare, consultant)
2006-10-18 8:00 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-10-18 9:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-18 11:30 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-10-18 11:49 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-18 12:23 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-10-18 12:42 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-18 12:44 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-10-18 12:55 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-18 13:04 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-18 13:39 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-10-18 13:51 ` Paulo Marques
2006-10-19 12:22 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-18 13:37 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-10-18 12:44 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-10-18 12:42 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-18 13:35 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-10-18 9:51 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-18 11:00 ` Helge Hafting
2006-10-18 11:14 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-18 11:23 ` Ric Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061018124420.GI24452@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=Thad.Phetteplace@ge.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=jakob@unthought.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox