public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, dino@in.ibm.com, menage@google.com,
	Simon.Derr@bull.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mbligh@google.com, rohitseth@google.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:15:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061019011546.39c7a8df.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453732CF.7050801@yahoo.com.au>

> But please don't let *users* try to deal with it.

Agreed - that's why I am about to send a patch that removes
the sched domain side affects of the cpu_exclusive flag.

Well, not entirely agreed.  User space code does need
to be able to specify some cpus as isolated from scheduler
balancing.  I will send a second patch to support that.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-19  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-16 23:03 [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags Paul Jackson
2006-10-17 18:43 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-17 19:18   ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-18  2:01     ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-18  7:05       ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-18 17:50         ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-19  6:30           ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-19  6:39         ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-19  7:03           ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-19  8:09             ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-19  8:15               ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2006-10-19  8:18                 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-18 17:49 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2006-10-19  6:00   ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-19  6:28   ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061019011546.39c7a8df.pj@sgi.com \
    --to=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
    --cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=rohitseth@google.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox