From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946278AbWJSRzr (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:55:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946280AbWJSRzr (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:55:47 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:19377 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946278AbWJSRzq (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:55:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:55:15 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: Nick Piggin Cc: akpm@osdl.org, mbligh@google.com, menage@google.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dino@in.ibm.com, rohitseth@google.com, holt@sgi.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus Message-Id: <20061019105515.080675fb.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <453750AA.1050803@yahoo.com.au> References: <20061019092607.17547.68979.sendpatchset@sam.engr.sgi.com> <453750AA.1050803@yahoo.com.au> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick wrote: > This should be done outside cpusets. So ... where should it be done? And what would be better about that other place? And by the way, I see in another patch you put some other stuff for configuring sched domains in the root cpuset. If the root cpuset was the right place for that, why isn't it the right place for this? ... strange. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401